
SYNDICATE 1947
11
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBER OF SYNDICATE 1947 (continued)
In preparing the syndicate annual accounts, the managing agent is responsible for assessing the
syndicate’s ability to continue in operation, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to its ability to
continue in operation and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the managing agent either
intends to cease to operate the syndicate, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual accounts
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the syndicate annual accounts as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
these syndicate annual accounts.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including
fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The
risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional
misrepresentations, or through collusion.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed
below. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those
charged with governance of the managing agent and management.
Our approach was as follows:
•
We obtained a general understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to
the syndicate and determined that the most significant are direct laws and regulations related to
elements of Lloyd’s Byelaws and Regulations, and the financial reporting framework (UK GAAP), and
requirements referred to by Lloyd’s in the Syndicate Accounts instructions. Our considerations of
other laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the syndicate annual accounts included
permissions and supervisory requirements of Lloyd’s of London, the Prudential Regulation Authority
(‘PRA’) and the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’).
•
We obtained a general understanding of how the syndicate is complying with those frameworks by
making enquiries of management, internal audit, and those responsible for legal and compliance
matters of the syndicate. In assessing the effectiveness of the control environment, we also reviewed
significant correspondence between the syndicate, Lloyd’s of London and other UK regulatory bodies;
reviewed minutes of the Board and Risk Committee of the managing agent; and gained an
understanding of the managing agent’s approach to governance.
•
For direct laws and regulations, we considered the extent of compliance with those laws and
regulations as part of our procedures on the related syndicate annual accounts’ items.
•
For both direct and other laws and regulations, our procedures involved: making enquiries of the
directors of the managing agent and senior management for their awareness of any non-compliance
of laws or regulations, enquiring about the policies that have been established to prevent non-
compliance with laws and regulations by officers and employees, enquiring about the managing
agent’s methods of enforcing and monitoring compliance with such policies, and inspecting
significant correspondence with Lloyd’s, the FCA and the PRA.